|
|
> No.616[¸µµ»ö¤Ø]
Not quite sure what you are asking about the teachers' contracts. Perhaps you can be more specific and then we can tell you. But basically the contracts with each teacher are the same but so very very vague and EXTREMELY short so that STEC never got itself in any trouble because it never, theoretically, promised anything, worth speaking of! Very clever Nakano! But it works both ways they promised nothing so we have not had to honor any deal with them. They broke what very simple contract they had with us by NOT PAYING our salaries as promised and therefore left us to do what we can do to get our salaries. Legally, of course!
If there are any teachers in the last few years that you might have liked and felt they were professional in their teaching please let us know as we might have their contact details.Obviously we will have to be careful that Nakano/Yonezawa does not pester them with his stupid claims and other tactics...Unless of course Nakano/Yonezawa you want to pay up and pay every teacher you still owe money to! ALL OF IT! ...And start with Robert Oji-chan and the other people you will be meeting or have met recently in court!...Very simple!
AbiKyokan¤µ¤ó¤Ø¤Î¤ªÊÖ»ö¤Ç¤¹¡£
> Thank you indeed for your very persuasive reply. From now on, I don't like to keep my concern with the specfic issue on Robert's skill. To turn around the talk, as far as I catch, no student knows of the contract or the agreement in existence between STEC and Starlight teachers in the biginning time. What were that ? Weren't they ? I am so curious to know about the possible difference from teacher to teacher. At least, the case in Robert is mistery. Is there any document or proof to argue against. If you don't mind, could you kindly let me know ! It's my very primitive question which someone proibably mentioned earier but I 'm not quite sure so far.
> Any way, according to your very clear suggestion, I am going to set up and seek
> my fevorite conversation class with my (new)friends as soon as possible. So much thanks for your kind reply and informative disscussion between us.
|
|